Skip to main content
ShipSafe
Sign In
One check, whichever AI tool wrote your app

Security Scanner forAI-Built Apps

Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, Windsurf, Cline, Bolt — whichever AI tool wrote your app, it wrote your auth logic, your database rules, and your API key handling. Nobody independent checked any of it. ShipSafe is that check, across whatever you built with.

Scan My App FreeView Pricing
Free scan2 minutesNo card needed
The short answer

Why Every AI-Built App Needs an Independent Check

Cursor, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf, Cline, Bolt — pick any AI coding tool, and the story is the same. It reads your prompt, writes the auth logic, wires up the database, and hands back working code fast enough that you ship it. What it doesn't do is tell you which shortcuts it took to get there.

The AI wrote your auth checks, your database access rules, and the code that handles your API keys. Nobody independent reviewed any of it. That's true whether your backend is Supabase, Firebase, or something you configured by hand — the AI made the same category of judgment calls, and those calls don't announce themselves as risks.

ShipSafe doesn't care which tool wrote your app. It scans your actual repository — the database rules, the API routes, the environment variables — the same way regardless of origin. For a breakdown of the specific classes we check, see the vulnerabilities by platform reference and our research on AI-generated code security.

Common vulnerabilities

Vulnerability Classes That Recur Across AI-Built Apps

These aren't tied to one tool. They're what happens when an AI writes your backend fast and nobody checks its work afterward — regardless of whether that AI is Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, or anything else. See our vulnerabilities by platform reference for the full breakdown.

  1. Row Level Security Left Disabled (Supabase-Backed Apps)

    Critical

    If your AI tool wired up a Supabase backend — Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, Claude Code, and plenty of others reach for it by default — check whether Row Level Security is actually enabled on every table. Supabase exposes your database directly to the browser via the anon key by design; without RLS policies, that key grants full read and write access to every row, to anyone.

  2. Firestore Rules Left in Test Mode (Firebase-Backed Apps)

    Critical

    If your app talks to Firestore or Firebase Storage instead, check the security rules. AI tools often leave the allow read, write: if true test-mode default in place after launch — the same open-by-default trap as an un-RLS'd Supabase table, just under a different backend.

  3. Secrets and API Keys Shipped in the Client Bundle

    Critical

    Across every stack we've scanned, AI tools reach for whatever environment-variable prefix makes the build tool happy — NEXT_PUBLIC_, VITE_, REACT_APP_, EXPO_PUBLIC_ — without checking whether the value behind it is a public key or a server secret. Anything with that prefix gets inlined into the JavaScript shipped to every visitor. Check yours before someone reads it from view-source.

  4. Missing Ownership Checks and IDOR on API Routes

    Critical

    AI tools write endpoints that do exactly what you asked — fetch the invoice, update the profile — without adding the line that checks the requester actually owns that record. Change the ID in the URL and you're looking at someone else's data. This is a pattern in the code, not a platform quirk, so it shows up whether the tool is Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf, or anything else generating your API routes.

  5. No Rate Limits on Endpoints That Call Paid APIs

    Medium

    If your app calls OpenAI, Anthropic, or another metered API from a route with no rate limit and no token ceiling, a single prompt-injected request or a scraping bot can run up a real bill in hours. AI tools rarely add throttling on their own. Check every route that talks to a paid API, not just your login form.

How ShipSafe Secures Any AI-Built App

1

Point ShipSafe at Your Repo

Connect your GitHub repo or paste your code — Next.js, Vite, Express, whatever framework your AI tool generated. ShipSafe doesn't need to know which tool wrote it.

2

One Scan, Every Stack Pattern

ShipSafe checks for the vulnerability classes above across Supabase, Firebase, and custom backends alike: RLS, Firestore rules, key exposure, ownership checks, and rate limits — whatever your AI tool actually built.

3

Get a Plain-English Fix

Every finding comes with the exact file, line, and fix — a migration script, a code change, or a config update you can apply directly. No security background required.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does ShipSafe only work with Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, v0, and Replit?
No. Those five have dedicated pages because we've profiled their specific patterns in depth, but ShipSafe scans any codebase regardless of which AI tool wrote it — Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf, Cline, Codex, Softgen, Tempo, Figma Make, or one you built by hand. The scanner reads your actual code and configuration, not the tool that generated it.
My app wasn't built with one of the tools you name elsewhere on this site. Can ShipSafe still scan it?
Yes — that's exactly what this page is for. ShipSafe doesn't need to know which AI tool wrote your app. It reads your repository: your database configuration, your API routes, your environment variables, and your auth logic, and checks all of it against the same rule set regardless of origin.
What's the most common vulnerability across different AI coding tools?
It depends more on your backend than on your tool. Apps on Supabase most often ship with Row Level Security disabled; apps on Firebase most often ship with Firestore rules left in test mode. Both leave the whole database open to anyone with your project URL. Exposed API keys and missing ownership checks on API routes show up constantly too, across every stack — these are AI-generation habits, not one tool's bug.
Is this really the AI tool's fault, or is it just what happens when you ship fast?
Both. Any developer moving fast can skip these checks, but AI tools generate the code that would normally force you to think about them — the migration, the API route, the environment variable — in seconds, without prompting you to add the security step. You never see the decision get made, so you don't know to go back and check it.
How is this different from your Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, v0, or Replit pages?
Those pages document patterns specific to how each tool's AI writes code, based on repos we've actually scanned. This page covers the vulnerability classes that recur across AI-built apps generally, regardless of tool. If your tool has a dedicated page, start there for the specifics — either way, the scan itself covers your whole codebase.

Is Your AI-Built App Actually Secure?

Whichever tool wrote it — Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, Bolt, or anything else — ShipSafe checks it in about 2 minutes. No card, no catch.

Scan My App Free

No credit card required. See all plans

This is an independent comparison provided for informational purposes. All product names, logos, and brands are the property of their respective owners; ShipSafe is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by them. Statements about other products reflect publicly available information at the time of writing and may change, so please verify current details on each provider’s own website.