Skip to main content
AI SAST for dev teams vs. for founders

ShipSafe vsCorgea

Corgea is a genuinely good AI-native SAST with auto-fix, and, like us, it targets AI-written code. The difference is who it's for, and that our fix PR re-scans itself to prove the fix worked instead of just reporting accuracy.

Free scan2 minutesNo card needed
Straight talk

The honest version

Credit where it's due: Corgea is one of the strongest AI-native SAST tools out there. It combines LLMs with AST analysis to find business-logic, auth, and code flaws, auto-generates fixes with high reported accuracy, and opens a pull request with the change. It even layers on top of scanners like Semgrep, Snyk, and GitHub Advanced Security. If you're a dev or AppSec team, it's excellent.

That's also the difference. Corgea is built for engineering teams inside a PR/CI workflow — connect your scanners, get fixes as pull requests, review them in your pipeline. It assumes you already think like a security-minded developer.

ShipSafe is built for the founder who doesn't. Paste a GitHub URL — no scanner stack to connect, no CI, no PR workflow — and get a plain-English report of what's exposed plus a fix prompt you drop straight into Cursor. Same enemy (AI-written bugs), different user.

Side by side

ShipSafe vs Corgea, side by side

AI-native logic analysis
ShipSafeYes — IDOR, broken auth, ownership
CorgeaYes — AI + AST finds logic & auth flaws too
Auto-fix delivery
ShipSafeCopy-paste fix prompt — you stay in control
CorgeaAuto-generated fix PRs, high reported accuracy
Who it's built for
ShipSafeSolo founders, no security background
CorgeaDev & AppSec teams
How you run it
ShipSafePaste a GitHub URL · ~2 min
CorgeaConnect repos/scanners, PR + CI workflow
Output style
ShipSafePlain-English report you can act on alone
CorgeaEngineering-grade fix PRs to review in CI
Setup friction for a non-dev
ShipSafeNone — just a URL
CorgeaBuilt around a CI/PR pipeline
Pricing model
ShipSafeFlat $0–$49/mo, self-serve
CorgeaTeam / enterprise, via sales
Proof the fix actually worked
ShipSafeFix PR re-scans the changed file and attaches a 're-verified resolved' receipt
CorgeaHigh reported auto-fix accuracy, asserted not re-scanned
Catches secrets in your deployed app
ShipSafeScans live JS bundles for keys shipped to the browser, then calls the provider to prove the key is live
CorgeaSource/SAST scope, a bundle-only leak isn't in the repo
Review on every pull request
ShipSafeGitHub App: inline, diff-aware security review on the lines you changed, pass/fail check, no CI setup
CorgeaFix PRs plus checks, assumes you've wired up CI
Auto-remediation at codebase scale
ShipSafeOne-shot fix prompt or a single self-verifying fix PR
CorgeaMature engine that triages and fixes findings across a whole codebase

Where Corgea is the right call

  • You're a dev or AppSec team that wants AI auto-fixes delivered as pull requests.
  • You already run Semgrep, Snyk, or GHAS and want AI to triage and fix their findings.
  • You live in a CI/PR workflow and want security to fit right there.
  • You want auto-remediation at scale across a codebase, not a one-shot read.

Where it leaves a solo founder exposed

  • It assumes a developer's PR/CI workflow — more than a founder wants for a quick safety check.
  • Best value comes when layered on a scanner stack you may not have.
  • Output is engineering-grade (fix PRs), not 'here's what's exposed' in plain English.
  • Onboarding and pricing are team-oriented, via sales.
  • Auto-fix accuracy is reported, not re-verified: ShipSafe re-scans the fixed file and attaches a 're-verified resolved' receipt so a non-dev can trust it shipped.
  • Source-level SAST won't catch a secret that only ships in your deployed JS bundle, and won't call the provider to prove a leaked key is still live.

Frequently Asked Questions

Corgea vs ShipSafe — aren't they the same?
Both target AI-written code with AI analysis, and both are good at it. The difference is the user: Corgea is built for dev/AppSec teams who want auto-fix pull requests inside CI. ShipSafe is built for a solo founder who pastes a GitHub URL and wants a plain-English answer plus a fix prompt for Cursor.
Does ShipSafe auto-fix my code?
ShipSafe gives you a copy-paste AI Fix Prompt you drop into your editor, so you stay in control. Corgea opens fix PRs for you to review — great if you're a team in a CI workflow.
Which is more accurate?
Both use AI for context-aware detection. Corgea reports high auto-fix accuracy for dev teams; ShipSafe optimizes for a founder understanding and shipping the fix fast. Use whichever matches how you work.
Can I use both?
Yes — ShipSafe for the fast plain-English read, Corgea if you want auto-fix PRs wired into your pipeline.

Same enemy. Built for you, not your CI.

Paste your GitHub URL. No scanner stack, no pipeline. The AI-code bugs that matter, in plain English, with a fix you paste into Cursor.

No credit card required. See all plans

This is an independent comparison provided for informational purposes. All product names, logos, and brands are the property of their respective owners; ShipSafe is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by them. Statements about other products reflect publicly available information at the time of writing and may change, so please verify current details on each provider’s own website.