ShipSafe vsURL & Website Scanners
URL scanners check your deployed site from the outside — headers, TLS, open ports. They never see your source, so the bugs that actually sink AI-built apps are invisible to them.
Straight talk
The honest version
URL and website scanners are useful for what they do: hit your live site and check the outside — TLS config, security headers, exposed ports, obvious misconfigurations, sometimes basic injection probes. Run one; it's a fine hygiene check.
But they scan the surface, not the source. They can't see that /api/invoices/43 skips an ownership check, that an admin gate exists only in your React component, that an auth condition is inverted, or that a service key is hardcoded in a file. Those bugs don't show up from the outside — and they're exactly what AI coding tools ship most.
ShipSafe reads the code. It clones your repo and analyzes your actual auth flow and data access — the logic a URL scanner can't reach — in plain English with a fix.
Side by side
ShipSafe vs URL scanners, side by side
Credit where due
Where URL scanners are the right call
- You want a quick check of TLS, security headers, and open ports.
- You're verifying production hygiene on a live URL.
- You need an external view of your deployed surface.
- You're pairing surface checks with a source-code scan (smart).
The catch
Where it leaves a solo founder exposed
- IDOR, broken auth, and missing ownership checks live in code — invisible from the outside.
- Hardcoded secrets sit in source files a URL scanner never reads.
- A clean external scan says nothing about your app's logic.
- AI tools ship logic bugs, which is precisely the blind spot.
Frequently Asked Questions
Isn't a URL scan enough?
What's the difference from ShipSafe?
Do I need my code on GitHub?
Will a URL scanner find my hardcoded API key?
The bug isn't on the surface. It's in the code.
URL scanners check the outside. ShipSafe reads the inside. Paste your GitHub URL — 2 minutes, plain English.
No credit card required. See all plans